2020 OCT 23 Medical Journals Refuse To Publish Landmark Danish Mask Study

.

GOOGLE A Serious Violators of the 1st Amendment
FACEBOOK A Serious Violators of the 1st Amendment
YOUTUBE A Serious Violators of the 1st Amendment
TWITTER A Serious Violators of the 1st Amendment
4CM_Telegram-thumbs-up-400w-480h.fw
Internet_Archive_thumbs-up-400w-480h.fw
bitchute-thumbs-up-400w-480h.fw
Gab_thumbs-up-400w-480h.fw
parler-thumbs-up-400w-480h.fw

Remarks: Could this be happening because a inconvenient truth about “The Establishments” convenient Truth on Masks and COVID-19 is rising on the dawn of scientific understanding; the only problem presently with this truth is the arena of “Science” is no longer science in the COVID World of this “Convenient Pandemic”. FULL STORY HERE: https://www.4cmitv.com/2020/10/24/2020-oct-23-medical-journals-refuse-to-publish-landmark-danish-mask-study/

Science has taken on the sinister and factious nature of “Politics and Social Engineering puppet masters” who lurk in the bleaches manipulating the strings to bring about the predetermined outcomes which supports the “Grand Plan” that’s humanity living in constant Fear which allows nefarious actors to abuse inalienable humans rights of Choice and Speech; bottom line Control Society and bring a passivity upon the human spirit that cherish freedom and liberty.

The Fourcm (4cm) Group: 4cminewswire.com  4cmitv.com  4cminews.com  fourcm.net
4cm Social Media: PARLER @Gary4cm  GAB @4cminewsire TWITTER: @4cmtvworld TWITTER: @4cminews YOUTUBE: @GaryGreen4CMiCTV BITCHUTE: @Freedom4CM

CRAIG KELLY MP HEADLINES: They Are Trying To Suppress The Truth ?

Compulsory wearing of masks outdoors are great way to spread the fear, and enhances the popularity of totalitarian rulers who use brutal lockdowns to ‘’keep us safe’’.

But what if the peer-reviewed research, in the largest ‘’gold-standard” randomised controlled trial ever undertaken, finds that wearing masks outdoors is completely useless for Covid – and worse, they actually cause other health problems ?

In a free democratic society, you’d think this would be important information that should be released to the public ?

However, three leading medical journals have refused to publish the results of the first major scientific investigation into the effects of wearing masks on the spread of COVID-19.

On October 18th, Alex Berenson revealed on Twitter that one of the study’s lead investigators, Professor Thomas Benfield, had said the study would be published

“as soon as a journal is brave enough to accept the paper”.

Anyone want a bet that this mask study (the largest ever carried out) doesn’t say what the pro-maskers would like. ?

And if the truth is being suppressed about masks, WHAT OTHER FACTS ARE THEY HIDING ?


BACKGROUND HEADLINES: Medical Journals Refuse To Publish Landmark Danish Mask Study. 

Three leading medical journals have refused to publish the results of the first major scientific investigation into the effects of wearing masks on the spread of COVID-19.

The authors of the long-awaited “gold-standard” randomised controlled trial have admitted their findings are “controversial” and are keeping them secret until their paper has been peer-reviewed and published. The Danish newspaper Berlingske has the details.

Professor: Large Danish mask study rejected by three top journals

(The journals are: The Lancet, JAMA and New England Journal of Medicine. )[1]According to  Lars Christensen @MaMoMVPY International economist, “Money Doctor”, sports analytics nerd, research associate Copenhagen Business School, lacsen@gmail.com +45 52 50 25 06 … Continue reading

The researchers behind a large and unique Danish study on the effect of wearing a mask are having great difficulty in getting their research results published. One of the participating professors in the study admits that the still secret research result could be perceived as ‘controversial’.

For weeks, the media and researchers around the world have been waiting with increasing impatience for the publication of a large Danish study [2]Article: Researchers need to test whether bandages protect against COVID-19 in public spaces

SEE URL: … Continue reading
on the effect – or lack thereof – of wearing a mask in a public space during the corona pandemic.

Now one of the researchers who has been involved in the study has said that the finished research result has been rejected by at least three of the world’s leading medical journals.

These include the Lancet, the New England Journal of Medicine and the American Medical Association’s journal JAMA.

“They all said no,” says the Chief Physician in the Research Department at North Zealand Hospital, Professor Christian Torp-Pedersen.

However, the Professor does not wish to disclose the journals’ reasoning.

“We cannot start discussing what they are dissatisfied with, because in that case we must also explain what the study showed – and we do not want to discuss that until it is published,” explains Christian Torp-Pedersen.

The study was initiated at the end of April, following a grant of DKK 5m [£600,000] from the Salling Foundations [owner of the Salling Group, Denmark’s largest retailer]. It involved as many as 6,000 Danes, half of whom had to wear face masks in public over a long period of time. The other half was selected as the control group.

A large proportion of the test participants were employees of the Salling Group’s supermarkets: Bilka, Føtex and Netto.

The study and its size are unique, and the purpose was once and for all to try to clarify the extent to which the use of face masks in public spaces provides protection against coronavirus infections.

ORIGINAL SOURCE: Date-stamped: 2020 OCT 22 | Time-stamped: 05.56 | Author: Lars Henrik Aagaard | Article Title: Professor: Large Danish mask study rejected by three top journals | Article Link: berlingske.dk

Cont’d: The Danish newspaper Berlingske has the details. by Will Jones

One of the co-authors, Henrik Ullum[3]Henrik Ullum Clinical Professor, Department of Clinical Medicine Rigshospitalet – Diagnostisk Center, Blegdagmsvej 9, 2100 København Ø henrik.ullum@regionh.dk https://ikm.ku.dk/ Phone: +45 … Continue reading, tweeted yesterday they are “VERY UNHAPPY”.

It wouldn’t be the first time politics has trumped science amongst those who are supposed to be its guardians. Professor Sunetra Gupta said in September that she was having unusual difficulty getting anything on herd immunity published, and Dr Gabriela Gomes has said the same thing.

I think we can be fairly confident that this mask study – the largest ever carried out – doesn’t say what the pro-maskers would like. On October 18th, Alex Berenson revealed on Twitter that one of the study’s lead investigators, Professor Thomas Benfield, had said the study would be published “as soon as a journal is brave enough to accept the paper”.

No courage would be required if the study confirmed COVID orthodoxy.

Watch this space.

ORIGINAL SOURCE: Date-stamped: 2020 OCT 23 | Author: Will Jones | Article Title: Medical Journals Refuse To Publish Landmark Danish Mask Study. | Article Link: lockdownsceptics.org

RELATED:

Article Title:
Mask Creep

Molly Kingsley, one of the three founders of UsForThem, has written a piece for Lockdown Sceptics today about the harm mandatory masking is doing to schools – particularly in those schools that over-interpret the Government’s advice and insist that children wear masks in the classroom – and the strange absent of any public debate about this. The Government didn’t allow the House of Commons to debate mandatory masking before ramming it through with a Statutory Instrument, and the House of Lords has failed to step into the breach.

I am increasingly despondent. Many who believe there should have been more rigorous analysis of this, the most intrusive non-pharmaceutical public health intervention of our times, speak as if the argument has been lost, or believe there are more important battles to fight. Alas, there are many battles ahead. But for children, this is a critical one, particularly for children with special needs. It is a debate we must have even when those around us tell us we should be ashamed to do so.

This is an excellent piece by a mother of two young children who has been red-pilled by the transformation of our democratic Government into a public health dictatorship.

WORTH READING IN FULL.

Publisher: LOCKDOWN SCEPTICS
Article Link: lockdownsceptics.org
Author: Molly Kingsley
Date Published: 22 October 2020. Updated 23 October 2020.

Unlike many news and information platforms, 4cminews is free to read, and always will be. There is no paywall here. We are independent, not affiliated with nor representing any political party or business organisation. We want the very best for our readers, nothing more, nothing less. Your support will help us continue to provide factual News about world events and Global Agenda’s.

You can contribute here. Thank you.

4cminewswire support independent media service


Hashtags: #4cminewswire, #masks, #Lancet, #JAMA, #NEJM, #COVID19, #4cminews, #4CMiTV, #4CM2020OCT23,

Tags: 4cminewswire, Masks, Lancet, JAMA, NEJM, COVID-19, 4cminews, 4CMiTV, #4CM2020OCT23,



References

1 According to  Lars Christensen @MaMoMVPY International economist, “Money Doctor”, sports analytics nerd, research associate Copenhagen Business School, lacsen@gmail.com +45 52 50 25 06 TWEET: https://twitter.com/MaMoMVPY/status/1319006641363341315?s=20
2 Article: Researchers need to test whether bandages protect against COVID-19 in public spaces

SEE URL: https://www.rigshospitalet.dk/presse-og-nyt/nyheder/nyheder/Sider/2020/april/forskere-skal-teste-om-mundbind-beskytter-mod-covid-19-i-det-offentlige-rum.aspx |

PDF of Article: rigshospitalet.dk-Researchers need to test whether bandages protect against COVID-19 in public spaces.pdf |
4 pages;
File Size 56 kb
3 Henrik Ullum Clinical Professor, Department of Clinical Medicine Rigshospitalet – Diagnostisk Center, Blegdagmsvej 9, 2100 København Ø henrik.ullum@regionh.dk https://ikm.ku.dk/ Phone: +45 35 45 34 51 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *